- Since Fluffy was less than 18 cat-years old, the court decided to appoint a guardian _₁_ _ _ _ _₄₇_.
- If the defendants are cats, they must, _ _₁₅_ _ _ _₅_ _ _, be chordate mammals!
- The Court granted _ _₂₉_ _₄₆_ _ _₁₇_ _ _ in Katz v. United States in 1967.
- STANDARD OF REVIEW. We review allegations of hissing and scratching _ _ _₂_ _₄₀_. That is, we must consider them from scratch.
- By a subpoena _ _ _ _₃₅_ _₁₀_ _ _ _, we ordered the party in interest to produce “all collars, leashes, microchips, shelter adoption certificates, etc., evincing ownership or actual control of said cat”.
- The prosecution of our client for yowling back in 2019, when the prohibition on yowling was only enacted for the first time in 2020, was barred as _₁₉_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _₃₃.
- I would love to see what happens the first time that a court issues a writ of _ _ _ _₃₁_ _ _ _₄₅_ _ _ _₃₆ to a ghost! (or to the Cheshire Cat)
- Pirate cats are absolutely adorable cartoon figures, although in principle under international law they are likely _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _₂₁ _₃_ _ _ _ _ _ (so not exactly man’s best friend!) if they engage in actual acts of shipping piracy.
- It was looking pretty bad for the defendant (after all, he was seen by numerous witnesses _ _ _ _₄_ _₃₈_ _ _ _ _ _ _₃₇_ _ _ _ _ actually in the act of eating the cat food), and ultimately his lawyercat advised him it was in his interest to plead _ _ _₈_ _₂₈_ _₁₄_ _ _ _ _ _ _.
- I moved to proceed _ _₂₂ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _₄₁_, stating in my financial affidavit that I only had two bowls, a cat toy, and a flea collar to my name.
- Since cats don’t have clearly established legal personality, a lawsuit against a cat would probably have to proceed _₂₇_ _ _ _₂₀ (hiss!).
- The defendant didn’t know and couldn’t have known that the cat food belonged to someone else, and hence couldn’t properly form a _₁₂_ _₂₄_ _ _₁₁_ in respect of its consumption.
- While the judge did indeed write “meow meow meow meow meow” in a footnote to her opinion, this observation had no bearing on the substantive matter in controversy, and can be dismissed as _ _₄₄_ _ _₁₆_ _₄₂_ _ _ _.
- The defendant allegedly promised the plaintiff “some cheese”, but in the absence of actual consideration or exchange of value, this court finds this promise unenforceable as a mere _ _ _ _₃₄_ _ _ _ _ _ _.
- I think we can make out a _ _₃₀_ _ _ _ _ _ _₁₃_ case for defamation over the reference to our client as a “mangy mutt”.
- A cat who represents himself (proceeding _ _ _ _ _₇ or, as it’s also often known, _ _₉ _ _ _ _ _ _ _₂₃ _ _₄₃_ _ _ _ _) has a fool for a client.
- It seems like the lawyercat agreed to take the case under the inducement of receiving 4,000 cans of cat food—a clear _ _ _ _ _₃₂_ _ _ _ _₃₉!
- The copyright trollcat tried to get the other court to re-examine the facts found by the first court in a case that was never challenged on appeal, but it refused to because they were _₁₈_ _ _ _ _₂₆_ _ _ _ _.
- I certainly hope the Court will reverse itself on the “legal personality for cats” issue, but the _₂₅_ _ _ _ _ _ _₆_ _ _ _ argument is pretty strong here.
(_ _ _ _ _ _ _,) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ █ █ █ █ █ █ █". 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47