Felis Catus

Felis Catus

solution


Jurisconsultus felinus quisque Latine bene scit, ut causam caudam bene ferat. ๐Ÿˆ
  • Since Fluffy was less than 18 cat-years old, the court decided to appoint a guardian _โ‚_  _ _ _ _โ‚„โ‚‡_.
  • If the defendants are cats, they must,  _   _โ‚โ‚…_ _ _ _โ‚…_ _ _, be chordate mammals!
  • The Court granted  _ _โ‚‚โ‚‰_ _โ‚„โ‚†_ _ _โ‚โ‚‡_ _ _ in Katz v. United States in 1967.
  • STANDARD OF REVIEW. We review allegations of hissing and scratching  _ _   _โ‚‚_ _โ‚„โ‚€_. That is, we must consider them from scratch.
  • By a subpoena  _ _ _ _โ‚ƒโ‚…_   _โ‚โ‚€_ _ _ _, we ordered the party in interest to produce โ€œall collars, leashes, microchips, shelter adoption certificates, etc., evincing ownership or actual control of said catโ€.
  • The prosecution of our client for yowling back in 2019, when the prohibition on yowling was only enacted for the first time in 2020, was barred as  _โ‚โ‚‰_   _ _ _ _   _ _ _ _ _โ‚ƒโ‚ƒ.
  • I would love to see what happens the first time that a court issues a writ of  _ _ _ _โ‚ƒโ‚_ _   _ _โ‚„โ‚…_ _ _ _โ‚ƒโ‚† to a ghost! (or to the Cheshire Cat)
  • Pirate cats are absolutely adorable cartoon figures, although in principle under international law they are likely _ _ _ _ _ _   _ _ _ _ _ _โ‚‚โ‚   _โ‚ƒ_ _ _ _ _ _ (so not exactly manโ€™s best friend!) if they engage in actual acts of shipping piracy.
  • It was looking pretty bad for the defendant (after all, he was seen by numerous witnesses _ _   _ _โ‚„_ _โ‚ƒโ‚ˆ_ _ _ _ _   _ _โ‚ƒโ‚‡_ _ _ _ _ actually in the act of eating the cat food), and ultimately his lawyercat advised him it was in his interest to plead  _ _ _โ‚ˆ_   _โ‚‚โ‚ˆ_ _โ‚โ‚„_ _ _ _ _ _ _.
  • I moved to proceed  _ _โ‚‚โ‚‚  _ _ _ _ _   _ _ _ _ _ _ _โ‚„โ‚_, stating in my financial affidavit that I only had two bowls, a cat toy, and a flea collar to my name.
  • Since cats donโ€™t have clearly established legal personality, a lawsuit against a cat would probably have to proceed _โ‚‚โ‚‡_   _ _ _โ‚‚โ‚€ (hiss!).
  • The defendant didnโ€™t know and couldnโ€™t have known that the cat food belonged to someone else, and hence couldnโ€™t properly form a  _โ‚โ‚‚_ _โ‚‚โ‚„_   _ _โ‚โ‚_ in respect of its consumption.
  • While the judge did indeed write โ€œmeow meow meow meow meowโ€ in a footnote to her opinion, this observation had no bearing on the substantive matter in controversy, and can be dismissed as  _ _โ‚„โ‚„_ _ _โ‚โ‚†_   _โ‚„โ‚‚_ _ _ _.
  • The defendant allegedly promised the plaintiff โ€œsome cheeseโ€, but in the absence of actual consideration or exchange of value, this court finds this promise unenforceable as a mere  _ _ _ _โ‚ƒโ‚„_ _   _ _ _ _ _.
  • I think we can make out a  _ _โ‚ƒโ‚€_ _ _   _ _ _ _โ‚โ‚ƒ_ case for defamation over the reference to our client as a โ€œmangy muttโ€.
  • A cat who represents himself (proceeding  _ _ _   _ _โ‚‡ or, as itโ€™s also often known, _ _โ‚‰  _ _ _ _ _ _ _โ‚‚โ‚ƒ  _ _โ‚„โ‚ƒ_ _ _ _ _) has a fool for a client.
  • It seems like the lawyercat agreed to take the case under the inducement of receiving 4,000 cans of cat foodโ€”a clear _ _ _ _   _โ‚ƒโ‚‚_ _   _ _ _โ‚ƒโ‚‰!
  • The copyright trollcat tried to get the other court to re-examine the facts found by the first court in a case that was never challenged on appeal, but it refused to because they were  _โ‚โ‚ˆ_ _   _ _ _โ‚‚โ‚†_ _ _ _ _.
  • I certainly hope the Court will reverse itself on the โ€œlegal personality for catsโ€ issue, but the  _โ‚‚โ‚…_ _ _ _   _ _ _โ‚†_ _ _ _ argument is pretty strong here.



(_  _  _  _  _  _  _,)    _  _  _  _  _    _  _  _  _  _  _  _    _  _  _  _  _  _,  1  2  3  4  5  6  7      8  9  10 11 12   13 14 15 16 17 18 19   20 21 22 23 24 25 

_  _  _  _  _  _    _  _  _  _  _    "_  _  _    _  _  _  _  _  _    _  _    โ–ˆ  โ–ˆ    โ–ˆ  โ–ˆ  โ–ˆ  โ–ˆ  โ–ˆ". 26 27 28 29 30 31   32 33 34 35 36    37 38 39   40 41 42 43 44 45   46 47